Skip to main content

Issues that the Green party should be championing in the election that aren’t the environment

Guest post by Well Hung Parliament's William Hayward:

Ah the Greens. “I’d love to see the Greens get in” the statement uttered by every left of centre voter right before they don't vote for them. So how can the Greens ever hope to get into power when even people who want them to be elected won't vote for them? Well one great solution would be to shout about a number of key policies they have which are not directly linked to the environment. That way you don't just appeal to eco-warriors and people living close to sea level. Here are four policies that the Greens could quite literally fight an election on without necessarily appealing to their key demographic.

The EU referendum


So it wouldn't be outrageous to say that the further right on the political spectrum you are the more likely you are to be against the EU and therefore in favour of a referendum you think would lead to an exit. You would therefore think that a political party broadly positioned to the left of all of the other mainstream parties would be against a referendum.

The Greens however are in favour of a referendum in order to use it as a mechanism to reestablish the direction and make up of the EU. They want to move it away from endless focus on free trade and promote “genuine cooperation” and enhance democracy (you can find it in full here).


Most of the UK is eurosceptic in leaning. Usually this not necessarily because they are bigoted little Englanders but because they have legitimate concerns about the European Union and its future direction. They are not against the EU fundamentally but are uncomfortable with its current form. However the only outlet these people have for this is essentially UKIP, who, let's face it, are bigoted little Englanders.

A concerted push to establish that the Greens are not anti European but are against the EU in its current form could be a huge vote winner if properly utilised.

Nationalise railways


Without a doubt one of Labour's most popular policies in the lead up to the election is the re-nationalisation of the railways. This is also a longstanding Green party policy.

Most of the electorate are in favour of turning what is a natural monopoly back into a state asset especially following consecutive year on year fare hikes.

If the Greens could tap into the public's annoyance that the unglamorous maintenance of the railways is conducted by the state and the profitable part run by the private sector they could have the potential for a huge return in terms of votes. Plus it would directly compete with one of the more left leaning Labour policies thus peeling off some of the core Labour vote.

Ban proactive recruitment of overseas NHS staff


The Green party have promised to ban proactive recruitment of overseas staff for the NHS. This is motivated by a desire to safeguard the NHS, keep high standards and reduce UK unemployment. This stands in stark contrast to UKIP who have the same policy but it is motivated by a desire to have as few brown people near them as possible.

There is a real political opportunity to be had by being a party that is perceived to stand up for the rights for British people and the NHS whilst not being driven by closet xenophobia. By positioning themselves as such they can appeal to a larger spectrum of voters while remaining true to their core voters with eminently sensible policies like amnesty for long term illegal immigrants.

Clear policies- e.g. Raising school age to 6 if parents want it


“There is no difference between any of the parties”. This utterly moronic statement is shouted by politically illiterate muppets across the land. Despite the fact it is clearly not true to anyone with the ability to use a search engine it does present a political opportunity.

A clear and emphatic difference in policy is what engages people. “If I vote for party A they will do this, if I vote for party B they won’t”. It is really simple and engages people far more than “both parties will cut the national debt but one will do it over 5 years from an increase in tax on the top 8.3% of earners whereas the other will do it off the back of cuts with no effect on frontline services”.

The Greens are in a great position in that they can position themselves as both a protest party by virtue of having few MP’s and a legitimate alternative by having clear, evidence based policies. A good example of this is the current Green policy of giving parents the option of raising the starting age of children in school to 6. If one takes even a cursory glance at the best performing countries in terms of primary schooling it is overwhelmingly countries that start children in school at an older age. It allows for great learning through play, language skills to develop and stops children being immediately behind because they are less developed than their peers.

A few clear, different policies with a scientific basis could propel the Greens into the political mainstream.



Well Hung Parliament (William Hayward) is a Cardiff based political commentator and journalist. He Tweets @whungparliamentHe blogs at https://wellhungparliament.wordpress.com. He Facebooks at www.facebook.com/parliamentwellhung

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Guardian’s self-defeating climate campaign

The Guardian has started a campaign. If you’re at all interested in climate change, you’ve probably seen it. It’s called ‘keep it in the ground’ , and calls on the world’s fossil fuel companies to leave about 80 per cent of their known reserves unburned. This picture pretty much sums up the idea: To make this happen, the Guardian is encouraging businesses, charities, trust funds, and anyone with skin in the game to ‘divest’ from fossil fuels. It’s doing this, in the words of its editor in chief, Alan Rusbridger, “in the firm belief that it will force the issue now into the boardrooms and inboxes of people who have billions of dollars at their disposal.” For the Guardian, this “simple idea” is the key to meaningful action on climate change. I’m not convinced.

Happy Retirement, Dad

A computer in a suitcase - that was the first inkling I had that my Dad had an odd job. Something mathsy; something sciencsy. It must have been the very early 1990s, and this was the closest his department at Cambridge University had to a 'laptop'. It could do four colours (black, white, bright pink, and luminous green), and it was heavy enough that three children aged between two and six years old couldn't move it (collectively try as they might). You could play Chess on it if you typed in a special code. 'Maybe Dad is a professional chess player?', I remember thinking, aged 4. He wasn't, it turns out. But his job was still pretty cool, I'd later learn. He's Dr Chris Hope, the creator of the PAGE integrated assessment climate model, who was for several decades a Reader at the Judge Business School at the University of Cambridge. I say 'was', because today is his last. Today, my Dad is retiring. Most people won't k...

Style and precision: Five tips on writing about climate change

... from someone who learned the hard way. "This makes no sense." "This is garbled." "No normal person can understand this." Time and again during my two and a bit years as a climate change journalist, a little yellow box would pop up alerting me to my editor's consternation. And they were spot on. I started with some knowledge, lots of enthusiasm, and no writing skills whatsoever. But as time went on, I like to think things improved. Here are five things I wish I'd known before I started. If you want to write about climate change, maybe they'll help you, too.